So I go onto facebook and see this as the status update of someone on my friends list (yeah, she went to my primary school, my mum used to be friends with her mum, but other than that she has nothing to do with my life whatsoever) :
"...would rather be a WAG wannabe any day then (sic) go to that hole they call Glastonbury.."
/Facepalm
As far as I know, a WAG is merely a young woman famous for doing nothing other than riding on her footballer boyfriend's coattails, or football shorts should I say. It's probably up there with going on Big Brother as one of the easiest ways to get famous. However, despite getting pictured in Heat magazine looking fabulous, they don't get any real respect from the public as they have no talent whatsoever, or if they did they certainly don't use it.
And yet, it seems to me there are more wannabe WAGS out there nowadays then there are wannabe female presidents. And that just makes me feel... depressed.
But enough bitching about the WAG lifestyle. What I really wanna know is, how is being a 'WAG wannabe' comparable to attending Glastonbury in any way whatsoever? Now, Glastonbury may not be exactly glamourous, and it may involve getting extremely muddy and slumming it in a tent for a couple of nights, but what makes it so special is the unification of thousands of people all there for the same purpose, and that is to simply enjoy live music.
So perhaps if the girl on my friends list had said 'I'd rather go to a football match than go to that hole they call Glastonbury' it at least would have made more sense. I wouldn't have agreed with it, but it would still have made sense. Hell, even if she said she'd rather be a WAG wannabe than a Glastonbury groupie, it would have made slightly more sense and the facepalm wouldn't have been as hard.
"...would rather be a WAG wannabe any day then (sic) go to that hole they call Glastonbury.."
/Facepalm
As far as I know, a WAG is merely a young woman famous for doing nothing other than riding on her footballer boyfriend's coattails, or football shorts should I say. It's probably up there with going on Big Brother as one of the easiest ways to get famous. However, despite getting pictured in Heat magazine looking fabulous, they don't get any real respect from the public as they have no talent whatsoever, or if they did they certainly don't use it.
And yet, it seems to me there are more wannabe WAGS out there nowadays then there are wannabe female presidents. And that just makes me feel... depressed.
But enough bitching about the WAG lifestyle. What I really wanna know is, how is being a 'WAG wannabe' comparable to attending Glastonbury in any way whatsoever? Now, Glastonbury may not be exactly glamourous, and it may involve getting extremely muddy and slumming it in a tent for a couple of nights, but what makes it so special is the unification of thousands of people all there for the same purpose, and that is to simply enjoy live music.
So perhaps if the girl on my friends list had said 'I'd rather go to a football match than go to that hole they call Glastonbury' it at least would have made more sense. I wouldn't have agreed with it, but it would still have made sense. Hell, even if she said she'd rather be a WAG wannabe than a Glastonbury groupie, it would have made slightly more sense and the facepalm wouldn't have been as hard.
